Urgent: Please oppose Clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill

Please customise subject line slightly to avoid your email being filtered out

Please include your full name, address and add a sentence or two saying why this personally matters to you. Or even better, please use these points as the basis for your own letter. Letters have a far greater impact when they are personalised.

Email Content:

Dear Lord XXX,

My name is [your name], and I am writing to raise my urgent concerns about Clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill. As the bill nears its final opportunity for revision, you, as a member of the House of Lords, are our last line of defence to protect our human rights.

Clause 9 of the Nationality and Borders Bill would give the Government the ability to strip a person of British citizenship without requirement to provide the person concerned written notice. The grounds for stripping someone of their citizenship without notice are wide ranging (including in the interests of national security, the relationship between the United Kingdom and another country, or otherwise in the public interest) and ultimately the decision would fall to the Secretary of State.

Having citizenship removed without warning would significantly reduce someone's ability to challenge the decision. Allowing the Secretary of State the ability to complete this process to their own discretion and without risk of challenge sets a dangerous precedent. Existing legislation is more than suitable, if the Secretary of State has good reason to deprive someone of British citizenship then a legal challenge shouldn’t be of concern to them.

Furthermore the prospect of leaving former British citizens stateless is in breach of international legal standards found in international treaties by which it is bound, including the United Nations’ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness.

Up to 6 million people are threatened by this bill, with up to 408,000 of them being born in this country and a great number of them at risk of being made stateless. In summary the bill has the power to victimise a huge proportion of the population with little oversight and obstructing their ability to challenge the decision legally. This is unacceptable.

Thank you for heeding the call for careful reconsideration of this Bill and helping to defend a democratic UK.
Yours Sincerely,
Your Name

Here is a list of lords to email!

XRUK have assembled their list of Lords for the PCSC action based on Lords who still turn up to parliament and don't have any party affiliation

There are about 800 Lords altogether, but only 300 are expected to vote. Of these Lords we have selected a list to email which will achieve the highest impact.

1: Lord Judge
2: Baroness Kennedy of Cradley
3: Lord Kerslake
4: Baroness Kidron
5: The Earl of Kinnoull
6: Lord Lea of Crondall
7: Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate
8: Lord Mann
9: Lord Marlesford
10: Baroness Masham of Ilton
11: Baroness Meacher
12: Baroness O'Loan
13: Lord Pannick
14: Lord Russell of Liverpool
15: Lord Taylor of Warwick
16: Lord Turner of Ecchinswell
17: Baroness Uddin
18: Baroness Watkins of Tavistock
19: Viscount Waverley
20: Lord Aberdare
21: Baroness Altmann
Twitter: rosaltmann
22: Lord Berkeley of Knighton
23: Lord Best
24: Lord Bird
25: Baroness Boycott
26: aroness Bull
27: Baroness Campbell of Surbiton
28: Lord Carlile of Berriew
29: Lord Cashman
Twitter: mcashmanCBE
30: The Earl of Clancarty
31: Baroness Coussins
32: Lord Craig of Radley
33: Lord Crisp
34: Baroness D'Souza
35: Baroness Falkner of Margravine
36: Lord Freyberg
37: Baroness Grey-Thompson
Twitter: Tanni_GT
38: Lord Hall of Birkenhead
39: Lord Hannay of Chiswick
40: Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green